Michael Jackson Didn’t Molest Any Kids: The Case for His Innocence
Member-only story
Michael Jackson Didn’t Molest Any Kids: The Case for His Innocence
It has never been anything more than a racist witch hunt.
More than a decade after his death, Michael Jackson’s legacy remains under attack. The accusations that once dominated headlines have resurfaced again and again, most recently in the documentary Leaving Neverland. Yet despite the emotional weight of that film, the actual evidence does not support the narrative of guilt. A closer look reveals a pattern of opportunism, contradictions, and media manipulation.
The 1993 Case: Extortion, Not Evidence
The first case never even resulted in criminal charges. Jackson submitted to a full-body strip search. According to multiple sources, the boy’s description of Jackson’s body did not match. Jordan’s father, Evan Chandler, had been recorded on tape before the accusation saying, “Everything is going according to a certain plan,” and, “If I go through with this, I win big.” This tape was never played on mainstream media.
The family filed a civil lawsuit and received a settlement, but Jackson never admitted guilt. Under California law, the settlement did not prevent criminal prosecution, which never happened. Jordan ultimately emancipated himself and became estranged from his parents, changed his name, and refused all involvement in later legal actions. He never spoke publicly or confirmed the abuse and refused to testify when subpoenaed. His father committed suicide in 2009.
The 2005 Trial: Acquitted on All Counts
The trial was comprehensive and heavily covered by the media. Jackson was charged with multiple counts of child molestation, attempted abduction, and giving alcohol to a minor. The accuser and his family were exposed as grifters with a history of fraud. The mother had previously falsely accused JCPenney security guards of sexual assault and battery.
During the trial, the Arvizo family was caught lying under oath multiple times. They were shown to have rehearsed their story. Multiple children who had stayed at Neverland testified that nothing inappropriate ever happened, including Macaulay Culkin, Brett Barnes, and Wade Robson, who accused MJ after his death before filing a civil suit against his enormous estate.
Jackson was acquitted on all counts by a unanimous jury after months of testimony and cross-examination.
Wade Robson and James Safechuck were once among Jackson’s most vocal defenders. Robson testified under oath in 2005 that Jackson never touched him. He praised Jackson repeatedly in interviews. In 2011, he tried to get a job directing a Cirque du Soleil Michael Jackson show. Only after being rejected did he suddenly claim he had been abused.
Robson and Safechuck: Changing Stories, Broken Timelines
Safechuck’s story also shifted after Robson came forward. His civil suit claimed Jackson abused him in the Neverland train station from 1988 to 1992. However, the station was not built until 1994. This timeline error was so obvious that even Leaving Neverland director Dan Reed admitted it publicly. Safechuck also claimed he “fled” Neverland at age 15 and never returned, but video footage from 1995 shows him attending an event at Neverland with Jackson.
Both men’s lawsuits were initially thrown out. Their suits were only revived after California changed its statute of limitations.
The FBI: No Charges, No Evidence
The FBI opened and closed multiple investigations into Jackson over the years, compiling more than 300 pages of files. Jackson’s homes were raided. Computers were seized. Confidential informants were used. After more than ten years, no child pornography was ever found, no hidden documents, and no physical evidence of abuse. The FBI concluded its inquiries without a single charge.
The Media: Profiting Off Persecution
The media profited heavily from Jackson’s public persecution. Tabloids often fabricated stories entirely, and headlines rarely matched the content. A 2003 documentary by Martin Bashir painted Jackson in a suspicious light, but the unaired outtakes later revealed Jackson’s warmth and innocence. Even Bashir’s own crew spoke out against how he manipulated the footage.
Leaving Neverland was similarly one-sided. It included no opposing viewpoints, excluded important context, and relied entirely on uncorroborated testimony from two men with clear financial motives. Both Robson and Safechuck stand to gain millions if the estate is found liable.
The Evidence Doesn’t Hold Up|
The evidence isn’t just thin. It’s full of holes. Accusers have lied, changed their stories, contradicted timelines, and acted with financial incentives. Every thorough investigation has failed to turn up a shred of hard proof.
Being eccentric, wealthy, and trusting made Michael a target. He was investigated, tried, and acquitted. He was surveilled, sued, and exploited. Yet no real evidence of abuse has ever emerged.
The case for his innocence is not based on emotion or loyalty. It is based on facts that others refuse to acknowledge.
A Legacy Too Powerful to Let Live
Greed may have motivated the accusers, but a lot of people contributed to the hysteria and injustice without personal profit. Government agencies, prosecutors, journalists, and even everyday observers helped fuel the fire. It would be naive to believe their motives were only financial rather than political, cultural, or rooted in unconscious bias.
Jackson wasn’t just a pop star. He was a black man using his massive platform to speak out again racism, inequality, and institutional correuption. Black or White wasn’t just a chart-topper. It was a cultural threat. He sang openly about the mistreatment of minorities, the failures of government, and the exploitation of the powerless, and he did it on the world stage. That made him dangerous to more than just greedy grifters — a threat to powerful institutions that profit from silence.
Deep Down, It Was Always About Race & Politics
Michael Jackson wasn’t destroyed just because he was rich or eccentric. The reason he was hounded so relentlessly is that he was a black man with too much influence and too much truth in his lyrics. You wanna know why MJ was targeted? Just listen to They Don’t Care About Us.
(Spoiler alert: They still don’t.)
https://medium.com/@heatherholmesrocks/michael-jackson-didnt-molest-any-kids-the-case-for-his-innocence-e568399318ff
Comments
Post a Comment